Position
of the UK
Most people think
of sterling when they think of the exchange rate exposure involved in Ireland
joining the single currency, and it is therefore appropriate to say something
about the position of the United Kingdom in relation to EMU.
In a speech made in
July 1997 the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer specified five economic tests
of the UK's suitability for EMU membership. The five economic tests are:
Are business cycles
and economic structures compatible, so that the UK and others could live
comfortably with euro interest rates on a permanent basis?
If problems emerge,
is there sufficient flexibility to deal with them?
Would joining EMU
create better conditions for firms making long-term decisions to invest
in Britain?
What impact would
entry into EMU have on the competitive position of the UK's financial services
industry, particularly the City's wholesale markets?
In summary, will
joining EMU promote higher growth, stability and a lasting increase in
jobs?
In his Statement
on EMU to the House of Commons on 27 October 1997, the Chancellor assessed
these five economic tests. His analysis was based on a UK Treasury paper
published on that date. This concluded that a successful EMU would bring
benefits for the UK economy by securing macroeconomic stability and underpinning
a well-functioning single market. This in turn would be good for investment,
growth and employment in the UK economy. However, reflecting the cyclical
divergences between the UK and Continental European economies at this time,
the Chancellor concluded that it would not be right for the UK to join
EMU from the outset.
On 23 February 1999 the UK Prime Minister, in
a statement to the House of Commons, launched an Outline National Changeover
Plan. In his statement he indicated that Britain's intention is that it
should join a successful single currency provided the five economic conditions
are met. The UK Changeover Plan outlines where preparations stand on the
practical aspects of possible UK entry to the single currency. It summarises
issues identified, conclusions reached and work done by the private and
public sectors.
The plan is not specific on when Britain would
adopt the euro. However, it sets out a broad indication of the time needed
for the various steps that would be involved in the transition from sterling
to the euro. The Plan indicates that making a decision to join the single
currency during the present Parliament is not realistic but that, should
the economic tests be met, this could be decided early in the next UK Parliament.
The Plan states that there will be further consultation
with business and the wider public sector on a timetable so that a further
Plan can be produced in about a year's time.